Music

Bad Bunny's Ex Wins Key Ruling in $40M 'Bad Bunny, Baby' Lawsuit

The Puerto Rico Supreme Court revives Carliz De La Cruz Hernández's $40M battle over the iconic 'Bad Bunny, baby' tag and who really owns that sound.

Bad Bunny's Ex Can Pursue Copyright Claim for Voice Note, Says Judge
Photo by Jacopo Raule/Getty Images

Bad Bunny’s ex-girlfriend just scored a major victory in her $40 million legal battle over the now-famous “Bad Bunny, baby” voice note. The Puerto Rico Supreme Court ruled that Carliz De La Cruz Hernández may pursue copyright and identity-rights claims involving the recording’s use on “Dos Mil 16,” a track from the superstar’s blockbuster 2022 album, Un Verano Sin Ti.

According to Rolling Stone, the court reversed an earlier dismissal of Hernández’s copyright claim, finding that her personal and recognizable vocal performance could potentially qualify for protection. Just as importantly, the majority determined that she presented enough facts to plausibly argue that Bad Bunny—real name: Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio—and Rimas Entertainment commercially exploited her identity without permission. One dissenting judge argued that both claims should have been dismissed.

At the center of the case are a few seconds of audio recorded long before Bad Bunny became one of the world’s biggest artists. Hernández says she recorded herself saying “Bad Bunny, baby” in a friend’s bathroom at his request in 2015.

The former couple began dating in 2011 while attending the University of Puerto Rico, reportedly became engaged in 2016, and briefly reconciled after separating. During their early years together, Hernández claims she also helped schedule performances and handle invoices and contracts as his career took shape.

According to the lawsuit, one of Bad Bunny’s representatives offered Hernández $2,000 for the recording in May 2022, shortly before Un Verano Sin Ti arrived. She declined, and no agreement was reached. Still, the voice note appeared on “Dos Mil 16.”

Hernández alleges it was subsequently used at concerts, on streaming platforms, on social media, on television, on radio, and in promotional campaigns. The exposure, her complaint said, left her feeling “worried, anguished, intimidated, overwhelmed and anxious.”

The ruling was not a total win for Hernández. Although she can continue pursuing claims tied to “Dos Mil 16,” the court found that she waited too long to seek damages over the voice note’s appearance on Bad Bunny’s 2016 song “Pa Ti.” That portion of the case was barred by the statute of limitations.

Bad Bunny, Rimas Entertainment, and manager Noah Kamil Assad Byrne were named in the original 2023 lawsuit.

Related Stories

Bad Bunny Tumbles On Stage During Mexico City Performance
Music

Bad Bunny Tumbles On Stage During Mexico City Performance

Despite the snafu, the crowd helped him finish singing 'Efecto.'

Jill Zarin Breaks Silence on 'RHONY' Reunion Firing After Racist Bad Bunny Comments
Pop Culture

Jill Zarin Breaks Silence After Being Dropped From ‘RHONY’ Spinoff Over Bad Bunny Comments

After backlash over her Bad Bunny comments, Jill Zarin has spoken out about being dropped from the upcoming ‘RHONY’ spinoff.

Bad Bunny Wants His $465K Legal Bill for Copyright Case Reimbursed
Pop Culture

Bad Bunny Wants emPawa Africa to Cover $465K Legal Tab After Failed Copyright Case

Inside the collapsed ‘Enséñame a Bailar’ copyright fight, missed deadlines, and why Bad Bunny says emPawa Africa should pay his $465K bill.

Stay ahead on Exclusives

Download the Complex App